Kabar Gemerlap - The trial of former Jampidsus Febrie Adriansyah resumed at the Jakarta Pusat Corruption Court on October 21, 2026, with prosecutors directly addressing his defense motions. The case, involving alleged money laundering stemming from corruption, has drawn significant legal scrutiny.
Prosecutors argue that the indictment thoroughly details the alleged actions against the defendant, urging the court to reject Febrie's motions and proceed to the evidence phase.
"Based on the above, we request the court to dismiss all objections raised by Febrie Adriansyah and his legal team," stated the prosecutor during the hearing.
Prosecutors emphasized that the defense's arguments largely pertain to case facts, asset ownership, and the legitimacy of the investigation, which must be addressed during the main trial, not the pre-trial objection phase.
"Most of the second objection's arguments pertain to factual disputes, asset ownership, and the legality of the investigation. These are not grounds for objection under Article 206(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and must be proven during the main trial," the prosecutor explained.
Prosecutors also requested the court to affirm the indictment's validity and reaffirm the Corruption Court's jurisdiction. The indictment alleges Febrie received Rp 346.743.821.282 and USD 440,990 from corruption-related activities between 2020 and July 2026, involving associates like Ferry Yanto Hongkiriwang.
"The defendant received Rp 346.743.821.282 and USD 440,990, which are suspected to originate from corruption," the prosecutor detailed.
Key transactions include a 5 million Singapore Dollar (equivalent to Rp 55 billion) payment linked to Tan Kian's property business, allegedly funneled through Ferry Yanto to influence Jiwasraya corruption cases. Additional allegations involve Rp 14 billion in shares from Michael Njoman's company and Rp 20.6 billion from Tria Bellitonito Aturbumi, among others.
"The defendant is suspected of receiving Rp 20.6 billion from Tria Bellitonito Aturbumi and Rp 60 billion in assets from PT Budi Agung Sentosa via intermediaries," prosecutors noted.
Febrie's defense challenged the indictment's clarity, arguing it fails to specify his personal involvement in alleged transactions. He questioned the connection between Ferry Yanto's actions and his own instructions, as well as discrepancies in transaction values and the absence of Ferry Yanto as a defendant.
"The indictment must clearly explain how Ferry Yanto's actions reflect my personal intent," Febrie asserted during his objection.
The court now faces the critical task of evaluating the prosecution's arguments and Febrie's objections, with a preliminary ruling determining the case's trajectory. The outcome will shape the next steps in this high-stakes legal battle.